Week 2: Manifesto of the Communist Party

I was extremely excited to see the Communist Manifesto as part of this weeks reading. The Manifesto is in many ways Marx and Engels’ introduction to revolution in a capitalist society, the likes of which had never been seen before. This text is perhaps the most influential book in modern history, not because it fully outlines how, when and where to achieve revolution, but rather because of this books ability to serve as a symbol. This manifesto has inspired millions of individuals and has been the ideological backbone for many revolutions. The Manifesto of the Communist Party is the second best selling book of all time, behind the Bible. This fact alone should serve as a testament to how powerful this pamphlet really is. For me, this is the first piece of communist literature that I ever read. I believe I began reading it for the first time when I was 14 and despite not grasping all the key concepts (which to be honest, I still don’t grasp all of what Marx is saying) it served as definitive evidence for me that communism is not only inevitable, but also necessary for the evolution of human society. Marx’s outlining of the class distinctions between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie are central to his theme that it is class, which dictates the function of society. I firmly believe in this principle and Marx’s interpretation, as when we analyze society through a dialectical-materialist perspective it is evident that class structure and antagonisms are necessary for exploitation to exist. Marx cleverly points out how capitalism is dependent upon the suppression of the working class, on the oppression of the proletariat by the bourgeoisie through state forces. He explains how the power structures of the state cannot be broken and reformed through “bourgeoisie democracy” but must be taken by force. He and Engels explain the necessity for the workers to rise up and seize the means of production for themselves and why should they not? They are the labour power which contribute to the production of commodities and thus capital. The capitalist serves no function, as he performs no labour. Instead the capitalist only serves as a leech in which he extracts monetary value from the workers. The surplus value generated by the labour of the workers goes to this capitalist and thus exploitation occurs readily and rampantly throughout a capitalist system. The capitalist only puts forward capital to generate a commodity but this act in itself should not be seen as justification for the capitalist making profit. How did this capitalist generate the startup capital in the first place? Did they work for this capital (which is extremely rare) or was the capital taken by force then handed down through a single family throughout history (the latter being extremely common for these large corporations). We must remember that it is the people, the working class citizens, who hold all power in society, and the moment that we collectively realize that is the moment when the very foundations of our society will shake and crumble. In today’s troubling times we must remember the canonical words of the Manifesto, “The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.”

It should also be noted that we read Thomas Jefferson’s The “Tree of Liberty” Letter and Letter to James Madison, as well as Maximillien Robespierre’s “Justification of the Use of Terror”. These texts were very influential and important but with the limited time and word count I had (which I have already exceeded) I felt my opinions were best showcased while talking about the Communist Manifesto, the text I am most passionate about.

5 thoughts on “Week 2: Manifesto of the Communist Party

  1. S. “communism is […] inevitable.” But of course, Marx and Engels thought it was around the corner… yet, 150 years on, it seems as distant as ever, no?

    Like

    1. I would not say as distant as ever. If we look at situations around the globe we are seeing a rising trend of popular dissent. Greece, Spain, Portugal and other European countries have seen surges in protests and riots over increasing austerity measures, and rising unemployment. The failure of SYRIZA in Greece has highlighted the limits of what reformism is capable of and people are becoming radicalized in larger numbers than seen in the past 30 or so years. The YPG and PKK in Kurdistan is in the process of carving out independent territory for a libertarian-socialist Kobane free from ISIS occupation. Communist guerilla groups are active in countries like the Philippines, Colombia, India, Nepal and various other nation-states. Another thing to note would be that Feudalism existed for many centuries before it was overthrown and replaced by Capitalism. I think it is a little naive (I mean no offense) to say that Marx’s predictions of the downfall of capitalism are defunct because his expected timeframe was off. Marx’s ideas on the tendency for the rate of profit to fall, wage slavery, alienation of labour and other key points he proposes in Capital are all still true in today’s society. This alone is evidence that further supports Marx’s predicitons.

      Like

      1. OK, let me qualify my statement a little (as in fact I did in class): yes, there have been rebellions and (in some cases) significant changes in the places you mention. I’d add the so-called “Arab Spring” (though its results have been mixed to say the least). But on the whole, in Western, “developed” countries such as Canada or the USA, doesn’t revolution seem to be a distant prospect?

        Like

  2. I think that in Western developed nations there is a lack of revolutionary conciousness because we are so far removed from the pitfalls of capitalism. By living in Canada, our success and normality is based off the exploitation of the working class in undeveloped countries (and to an extent even in Canada itself). I believe that until the foundations of capital can be shaken we will not see revolution in first world countries. However this is not always the case (the situation is incredibly complex and difficult to quantify) as class consciousnes is the true teller of when a revolution is possible. I doubt that tomorrow I will wake up and all of the sudden the Canadian working class will rise up and seize the means of production, but it can happen in short periods of time, or longer ones. All I can attempt to do is act as a spark in the hopes of igniting a revolutionary flame. I suppose this is idealistic but I would rather be an idealist than expect living in a society of exploitation and oppression.

    Like

Leave a comment